Monday, March 2, 2009

The Candyman is a Ghost of America’s Dark Past


Myths and urban legends are self-perpetuating. That self-perpetuation is what makes myths and urban legends powerful. If people believe in something then that makes it present in someone’s mind. in the 1992 horror film, Candyman, the title character is a myth who gains his power through people believing in him and ultimately fearing him. To feed the film’s racial subtext, Candyman is a symbol of how slavery and the racism in America it spawned is a ghost that keeps haunting Americans regardless of their race.


Candyman centers around Chicago grad student Helen Lyle (played by Virginia Madsen) who’s doing a thesis paper on urban legends and how black people, especially in ghetto areas use urban legends as excuses for their poverty and lives of crime. She enters Chicago’s infamous Cabrini Green projects and learns of the Candyman myth. She soon believes in the myth and that’s when her life takes a turn, and in typical horror/slasher film fashion, the body count starts rising.


Candyman is first and foremost a supernatural ghost story that is rooted in reality. Bernard Rose adapted Clive Barker’s short story, “The Forbidden” and links the supernatural to modern race relations in America. Race is something that people try to ignore or deny, and Candyman acts as a symbol to remind people that race is a very real thing. The film subtly implies that Candyman made the black people of the ghetto commit crimes. His wrath mirrored the wrath of black people, and the cycle continues.


The racial element of the film concerns the immortal racism of America, and how the macabre past of slavery haunts Americans. The Candyman acts as a vessel of anger because of his gruesome death at the hands of racists during the later part of the nineteenth century. He is a symbol of the anger that black people in ghettos like Chicago’s Cabrini Green projects featured in the film. In a way, the film suggests that the black people of Cabrini Green keep the myth of Candyman going because he’s a link to the past that. Some people try to forget the horrors of slavery and act like it doesn’t exist or just doesn’t matter. The fact that the urban legend of the Candyman ends up being real is meant to prove to nonbelievers that the horrors of slavery and racism are real. It proves that the struggles of being a black person in America are real and that black people are not just using their race as an excuse for being poor or committing crimes.
When Helen first arrives in the Cabrini Green projects with her colleague Bernadette, she interviews a black single mother living in her apartment.

Bernadette is a light-skinned black woman, while the single mother is of a darker skin tone. Bernadette can barely look the woman in the eye. Bernadette’s been around upper-crust and highly-educated people who are mostly white that she’s kept herself at a distance from the ghetto. When she’s face-to-face with the ghetto, it scares her. From the moment Helen and Bernadette arrive in Cabrini Green, Bernadette acts nervous and scared as if the boogeyman is going to pop out at any moment. In reality, she fears that a gun-toting thug will attack her, rape her and probably kill her. Even if when someone visited the ghetto and they didn’t see any violence or anything particularly menacing, they’d still hold onto a stigma of the ghetto. That stigma represents the violence and fear associated with black people. The stigma concerns beliefs about the way black people look physically to stereotypes of black people being violent and oversexed, which makes the fact that Candyman is a black man interesting.


The Candyman (played by Tony Todd) was the son of a slave who was educated the best schools because he had a talent for painting. He was killed because of his relationship with a white woman and the fact that she was pregnant with his child. Tony Todd plays Candyman as a man of breeding with his carefully enunciated words and deceptively authoritative voice that hums like bees. For a character who’s meant to be scary, Candyman is nonthreatening, save for the bloody hook that replaced his severed hand. The inclusion of Candyman’s back-story shows that Candyman is not even really a villain, but a victim.


Candyman uses his voice to hypnotize people. His voice is an instrument that haunts with its deep, melodic tone that is just as romantic as the interaction between Candyman and Helen. The reason Helen tears up pretty much every time she sees Candyman is because her belief in him is such a real thing; she believes in him with her soul.
Candyman is a ghost and as a ghost, he wanders from decade to decade, era to era. In Lafcadio Hearn’s prose-poem, “A Ghost,” he sums up the concept of a ghost well. “I refer to the civilized nomad, whose wanderings are not prompted by hope or gain, nor determined by pleasure, but simply compelled by certain necessities of his being,--the man whose inner secret nature is totally at variance with the stable conditions of a society to which he belongs only by accident.”


The piano music that plays while Candyman asks Helen to become immortal, a feeling of haunting is summoned, as well as mystery. This scene is made up of intense seduction and eroticism. The piano music tinkles as if it’s concerning a taboo subject, which the scene is. The interracial chemistry between Candyman and Helen is apparent. Although interracial romance is viewed as still somewhat taboo, the combination of Candyman and Helen is perfect. Candyman’s hook-for-a-hand acts as a direct phallic object and contributes to the film’s eroticism. The hook is direct because Candyman strokes Helen’s thigh with the hook and proceeds to grope her groin, implying penetration.


The murals on walls, including the mural of Candyman on a building’s wall suggests the importance of storytelling and oral tradition, which is very common in black culture. The past haunts minorities living in America more than non-minorities.


Helen’s realization that the Candyman is real is meant to be the equivalent of a white person accepting and realizing the difficult plight of being a black person living in America. Candyman is an allegory that intends to communicate that racism is still alive and kicking in America, despite the America having its first black president. As sad as it sounds, racism in America is immortal, just like Candyman.

2 comments:

  1. What works well in this blog is a clear knowledge of the subject matter. While the introduction probably needed an extra sentence or two, it is always interesting to look at what social issues horror films are attempting to portray. The idea of self perpetuating myth is also interesting.
    The next three paragraphs work really well. There is just enough synopsis to fill in any readers who may not have ever seen Candyman. Inserting the origin of the film helps in solidifying the validity of this blog as the writer’s knowledge is emphasized with points like this. These early paragraphs also deal with the purpose of telling this story. The important social issue of slavery comes through in this blog and makes Candyman stand above the slew of unimpressive horror films that were released in the early nineties.
    While the blog had a strong start the next few paragraphs do not add much into either a review or an in-depth look at the film. They are essentially an unnecessary amount of summary. Some creative language is used here, but overall, the blog loses its momentum.
    With the last two paragraphs the blog picks up again. The best use of language is used at the very end of the blog and it adds a strong finish. Slavery and racism really come back strongly in this part of the blog and it makes the entire piece come together.
    This blog had a strong opening and closing, but the middle lacked. The racism theme should have been more prominent during the body of the blog. The blog also lacked a clear voice as it seemed to be part review, part synopsis, and part analytical. There was strong use of creative sentences throughout, which really made the blog more interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Having never seen Candyman, I am now intrigued to see it. This criticism struck a nice balance between plot summary and plot importance.

    During the plot summary, you pointed out a few of the key plot points while not giving the film away. You explained why certain things are relevant in a larger perspective. I think that this is important because for someone who hasn’t seen the film, it gives them a reason to see it. I am not one to usually go out and see slasher movies, or horror flicks, but seeing as there is more to this film, I am interested to see the contrast and how that takes hold of the film.

    In the criticism, you mention the importance of race relations in the film. I think that it is important to remember how things like race play an importance to a lot of films. Often times, small things like this are over looked. From this criticism though, this theme is brought right to the forefront.

    The good part about this piece is that it is very straightforward with what you want to tell the reader. In the beginning, I was drawn into read more because of this. You had stated what the film was “first and foremost” and continued on from that point. I think that being straight forward with the reader is important because they want to see where you are going with things. I liked that I was able to see you were upfront and were not going to beat around certain ideas, but just lay the film out there so that I may or may not want to see it (in this case, I do want to see it!)

    In the opening paragraph, you cite how myths are self-perpetuating and go on to explain how the film holds true to this. I think that you could have gone into a little more depth about urban legends and the history of that before introducing the film as you did. I think that the first paragraph could be used to develop an idea that will run through the whole criticism before introducing the film.

    Overall, the criticism was good. It had a lot of strengths like the plot summary and explanation of why certain elements are relevant. I think that you could have talked more about the process of making the film and how that shaped some of the importance, but you were able to clearly communicate that it is important to look at certain elements that may be overlooked sometimes, especially when it comes to race relations.

    ReplyDelete